cool dating usernames

Smooth’s Dating Service

carbon dating kids

Is there evidence of evolution?

I don’t want anyone to put down creationists or there to be a debate on evolution. All I want is evidence of evolution… Please don’t tell me about bones because all bones mean is something died you have no evidence other than something died(meaning you can’t say something came from it). The fossil record doesn’t exist anywhere in the world so do not use that. It’s only told to kids in the text books, so please don’t refer to it. Carbon dating is not constant, people have dated things twice and gotten totally different answers, so please don’t use that either. I want evidence.

Thank you.

Sir, I am sorry to tell you there is no evidence of evolution, no matter how hard you look:

Embryonic recapitulation is not a rerun of man’s evolution. An embryo does not have “gill slits”. What looks like “gill slits” don’t even develop into respiratory organs. It develops into part of the inner ear and the thyroid gland.

Natural selection and evolution cancel each other out. Take the bat. Supposedly it developed from a shrew like creature. But in part of its evolution, it would have huge webbed feet and tiny back feet. It would have echolocation but wouldn’t be able to use it. Its kind would die out. Where did natural selection go? It sure wasn’t the fittest.

Or take a reptile evolving into a bird. Just their respiratory tracts are amazingly different. Reptiles breathe into their lungs, birds breathe through them. Bird have air sacs, a four chambered heart (reptiles have no air sacs and a three chambered heart, except the croc), and hollow bones. So um, how did the heart and lungs still function as each little step took place?

Evolutionists say comparitive anatomy proves evolution. But it actually shows an Intelligent Creator. He just used the same blueprints for mammels, for reptiles, for birds, and varied them so they could live in their climate. Look at cars. All vehicles usually have for wheels, a trunk, an engine, and windows. But the car varies for the consumer. We know it had an intelligent designer. But we don’t leap out of our car at the sign of a three wheeled car and say it evolved. Wait…I think my car may be showing signs of an H3…..

Punctuated equilibrium doesn’t solve the problem either. Genetic variety has limits. I’m so glad my grandparents didn’t have a Clinton. Now that would be way out of a human’s genetic possibility! But seriously. No dinosaur had a bird hatch out of it’s egg. And that’s no duck!

Well that’s just a bit to get you started.

(Also, I think this guy should be voted president–of Molly Brown’s pool floats.)

Carbon Dating

the bases dating

what are the bases of dating?

like dont laugh but isnt it like first base making out, 2nd boobs idk what are they?

1-making out
2-boobies/hand job
3- ORAL
home-sex

Parents of Teenagers discussing dating on Air Force Bases

carbon dating wiki

Is carbon dating accurate?

why?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dating

it is probably the most accurate thing we have right now and it is very effective but the half-life of carbon-14 is only 5730 years, so the method cannot be used for materials older than about 70,000 years

Questioning the validity of the Synoptic Gospels…

bases dating

details on what the bases in dating mean?

you know like:1. …….2. ……3. …….home. i know what that one means.

LMAO..
kissing
touching
touching bare skin
sex.. penetration type sex.. yeah.. i think that’s pretty accurate.

stay off the field

Parents of Teenagers discussing dating on Air Force Bases

carbon dating what is it

Creationists, what peer reviewed study exists that shows carbon dating to be inaccurate?

The 1956 Noble prize was for accurately dating samples from Egyptian tombs that had known ages. As far as I know, no similar study exists that shows it as anything but right on. The test method has only gotten better since then.

It would be pretty simple to show that it was missing dates.

None that I know of, but one has to remember that every date has a 95% confidence interval around it, so two tests may give different dates within those confidence limits. Also, radiocarbon dating has to be done correctly. For instance the raw date provided has to be calibrated to account for changes in atmospheric C14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating For another, it can only be applied to organic substances, which means applying it to fossil bone is tricky. Scientists can generally tell when circumstances are going to produce decreased accuracy, however, and multiple dating tests are often used to corroborate one another.

Listless wrote: “there are quite a few studies showing it innacurate. … “Accelerator radiocarbon dating at the molecular level” Journal of Geological Science.”

Response: That article showed ways for applying radiocarbon dating to fossil bone, and showed known situations under which it can be applied accurately and situations where it can’t. It did not show radiocarbon dating to be inaccurate in general. http://www.bcin.ca/Interface/openbcin.cgi?submit=submit&Chinkey=127099

kdanley wrote: “Whenever scientists date a sample, they already have an idea on how old it is based on assumptions. They can test a sample ten times and get ten different answers.”

Response: They often have an idea based on evidence, not assumptions. They can get ten different answers, but if the tests are correctly run, then all are likely to be within the recognized confidence limits of the dating method. Those confidence limits are quite precise.

kdanley wrote: “Furthermore, even if it were trustworthy it would still be only good for about 50,000 years or so. Anything older cannot be tested with C-14.”

Response: That’s why other methods are used for older materials.

Listless wrote: “EDIT CIRBRYN, so, please provide unbiased % accuracy for c14 dating.”

Response: The accuracy is 95%. That’s what a 95% confidence interval means. The accuracy is established by comparisons to other recognized methods such as dendrochronology (tree rings).

Listless wrote: “Oh, I can give you DOZENS of more studies showing it inaccurate.”

Response: And yet you haven’t.

Listless wrote: “if you read the abstract carefully you would notice *at molecular level* no ?”

Response: Yes. So?

Chemistry Time - Carbon Dating

good online dating usernames

Ready to Mate - Project Direct

carbon 14 dating wiki

Recordings from Rodney #2 of 10: A Journey of Faith

in dating what are the bases

Alien Moon Bases: Glenn Steckling Pt.1

carbon dating pictures

Name specific events where radiometric dating or carbon dating has been used?

Pictures would be nice. Name the person, what they dated, and how old what they dated was.

The Shroud of Turin. It is the purported burial shroud of Jesus Christ, but was shown to be a forgery dating to the early- to mid-14th century. I think the carbon dating ranged from approx 1260 to 1350.

1-5 Vinland Viking Map or Million Dollar Hoax

Next Page »